ArticlePolymers2026
Application of
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leachates generated in sanitary landfills are a mixture of contaminants harmful to adjacent ecosystems. Coagulation and flocculation are common treatment methods; however, their efficiency depends on the type of coagulant-flocculant and the operating conditions. This study addressed leachate treatment using two natural biocoagulants, Nostoc sphaericum (CNS) and Opuntia ficus-indica mucilage (CMN), in combination with aluminum sulfate (CSA). Optimization was performed using response surface methodology, employing a Box-Behnken design with five factors, namely CNS, CMN, and CSA doses, as well as agitation time and agitation speed, evaluated at three levels, on turbidity reduction. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed that the biocoagulants possess anionic surfaces with carboxyl and hydroxyl groups. The particle size of CNS exhibited a bimodal distribution with a zeta potential of -28.74 mV, while CMN showed a unimodal distribution with a zeta potential of -21.95 mV. Under optimal conditions (88.97 mg/L CNS, 105.60 mg/L CMN, 9.13 mg/L CSA, a mixing time of 25.96 min, and an agitation speed of 24.21 rpm), a turbidity reduction to 48.15 NTU was predicted. During the experimental validation of these optimal conditions, turbidity was reduced to 49.02 NTU, achieving a removal efficiency of 70%. Total organic carbon (TOC) was reduced by 65%, and metals such as arsenic were reduced by 56%. Reductions in phosphates and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.