Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41754603›Full record

ReviewViruses2026

Machine Learning in Preclinical Development of Antiviral Peptide Candidates: A Review of the Current Landscape.

Hannah Hargrove, Bei Tong, Amr Hussein Elkabanny, Xiaohui Frank Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah HargroveDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Bei TongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Amr Hussein ElkabannyDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, North Adams, MA 01247, USA.
Xiaohui Frank ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8778-595X

Funding

National Science Foundation CBET-2226779NIH HHS AI133634NIH HHS AI163708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of antiviral peptide (AVP) design, one of the most prominent limiting factors is the time and material cost required to perform the initial screening of novel AVPs. In particular, traditional target identification as well as traditional preclinical screening of novel drug candidates can be a very lengthy and expensive process. In recent decades, target identification and initial screening of AVPs has been increasingly carried out using machine learning (ML). The use of ML to initially screen potential interactions reduces the financial cost and lengthy time scale of preclinical AVP development, allowing for candidate peptides to be identified and screened faster, at a lower cost to both manufacturer and consumer. Additionally, the use of ML in generating and screening AVP candidates allows a more diverse chemical space to be explored than high-throughput screening methodologies allow. In silico generation and validation of AVP candidates also limits researcher contact with high BSL-rated viruses, thereby increasing the safety and accessibility of AVP design. This review seeks to provide a broad overview of the current uses of ML in early-stage AVP design, and to shed some light on the future direction of the field.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsMachine LearningPeptidesAnimalsDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansAntiviral AgentsPeptidesantiviral peptidesartificial intelligenceearly-stage drug designmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41754603
PMCPMC12944945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.