ReviewViruses2026
Bridging the Structural Gap: A Methodological Review of Cryo-Electron Microscopy for Underrepresented Viruses.
Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has revolutionized structural virology, enabling routine structure determination at 2-4 Å resolution, with exceptional cases reaching 1.56 Å. The structural diversity of viruses across vertebrate, plant, and insect hosts provides fundamental insights into infection mechanisms, host-pathogen coevolution, and therapeutic target identification. However, analysis of Electron Microscopy Data Bank entries reveals notable disparities in structural coverage: among 11,717 eukaryotic virus structures (excluding bacteriophages), vertebrate viruses constitute 97.6% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.