Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41754394›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Tuberculosis Diagnostic Methods: Clinical Applicability, Implementation Challenges, and Integrated Testing Strategies.

Eduarda Rabello, Fernanda de-Paris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current laboratory diagnostics for tuberculosis: from conventional approaches to next-generation molecular and immunological technologies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eduarda RabelloSpecialization in Clinical Microbiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-903, RS, Brazil.
Fernanda de-ParisLaboratory Diagnostic Service, Microbiology Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2563-9487

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos (FIPE) from the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) - https://ror.org/010we4y38. https://ror.org/010we4y38.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of death from a single infectious agent worldwide, a burden further exacerbated by HIV co-infection and the increasing prevalence of drug-resistant strains. Although a wide range of laboratory diagnostic methods are currently available, their applicability, implementation, and clinical impact vary substantially across healthcare settings with different levels of complexity and resources. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the main laboratory diagnostic methods for active and latent TB, emphasizing their clinical applicability, implementation challenges, and role within integrated diagnostic strategies. Conventional approaches, such as smear microscopy and culture, are discussed alongside modern diagnostic technologies, including automated nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), line probe assays (LPAs), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and lateral flow assays, highlighting their strengths and limitations in distinct epidemiological and operational contexts. Unlike existing WHO guidelines and prior reviews that predominantly focus on test performance and recommendation status, this review adopts an implementation-oriented perspective, critically examining diagnostic methods in light of real-world constraints, regional disparities, and evidence gaps. Particular attention is given to limitations related to laboratory infrastructure, biosafety, workforce capacity, and sustainability, as well as to under-addressed areas such as latent TB, metagenomic approaches, and the investigation of co-pathogens. By integrating WHO guidance with contextual and operational considerations, this review aims to support rational test selection and the development of flexible, integrated diagnostic workflows tailored to local health system capacity, patient populations, and clinical scenarios, thereby strengthening the effectiveness and equity of TB diagnostic strategies.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisHumansNucleic Acid Amplification Techniquesdiagnosisdiagnostic testssensitivityspecificitytuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID41754394
PMCPMC12942670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.