Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41754303›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Are We Chasing a Wild Goose? Rethinking Breeding Targets for Salinity Stress Tolerance in Rice.

Qian Xu, Ping Yun, Kiril Tenekedjiev, Natalia Nikolova, Babar Shahzad, Jiarui Zheng, Lana Shabala, Meixue Zhou, Sergey Shabala

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qian XuSchool of Architecture and Planning, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China.
Ping YunSchool of Biological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1030-0683
Kiril TenekedjievAustralian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.
Natalia NikolovaDepartment of Computer Sciences, Varna Free University "Chernorizets Hrabar", 9007 Varna, Bulgaria.
Babar ShahzadSchool of Agriculture, Food & Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4358-3539
Jiarui ZhengHubei Key Laboratory of Spices & Horticultural Plant Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, School of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jinzhou 434023, China.
Lana ShabalaSchool of Biological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Meixue ZhouTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3009-7854
Sergey ShabalaInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2345-8981

Funding

Australia-India Strategic Research Fund AISRF48490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salinity stress has become an increasingly critical challenge for agricultural production, especially for rice, a staple crop that feeds over 50% of the world population but is extremely sensitive to salt stress. In this study, ten rice genotypes were treated with three salinity levels (0, 50, and 100 mM NaCl) to investigate the effects of salt stress on rice, and this data was then used to build regression models that describe plant growth responses as a function of stomatal conductance (Gs), chlorophyll content (SPAD), and shoot K

Indexed as

K+ retentionNa+ exclusionricesalt stresssalt tolerance

Identifiers

PMID41754303
PMCPMC12943982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.