ReviewNutrients2026
Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Dietary Potassium Intake: A Narrative Review of Epidemiological Evidence.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Mediterranean dietary pattern (MDP) is recognised as one of the most evidence-based dietary models for the prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Its plant-rich composition suggests an inherently high potassium intake, yet epidemiological findings on the association between MDP adherence and potassium intake remain heterogeneous. The present review aims to summarise and critically evaluate the available evidence on the association between adherence to the MDP and dietary potassium intake in the adult population.
methodsWe conducted a narrative review of observational, longitudinal and interventional studies evaluating the relationship between MDP adherence and dietary potassium intake (self-reported assessment and/or 24 h urinary potassium). MEDLINE/PubMed was searched from inception to 30 October 2025, additional studies were identified by reference screening.
resultsFrom a total of 263 studies retrieved, 10 eligible studies (7 cross-sectional, 1 longitudinal, 2 randomised controlled trials) from Europe, Asia and North America were synthesised. Questionnaire-based studies consistently indicated higher potassium intake with greater MDP adherence, whereas biomarker-based findings were more variable and often attenuated, particularly in studies relying on single or unvalidated 24 h urine collections and selected samples. Overall risk of bias was high for most observational studies, while randomised trials were generally rated as having some concerns.
conclusionsHigher MDP adherence is generally associated with higher potassium intake, but estimates vary by how MDP adherence is defined and scored, the potassium assessment method, and population context. Current evidence remains insufficient to quantify potassium's potential contribution as a candidate mediator without formal mediation analyses and robust exposure assessment, including repeated validated 24 h urine collections. Standardised scoring, routine reporting of potassium, sodium, and the Na/K ratio, and triangulation across dietary, biomarker and intervention evidence are key priorities to strengthen inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.