ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Deep Learning for Emergency Department Sustainability: Interpretable Prediction of Revisit.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department (ED) overcrowding strains clinicians and potentially compromises urgent care quality. Unscheduled return visits (URVs), also known as readmissions, contribute to this cycle, motivating tools that identify high-risk patients at discharge.
methodsThis study performed a retrospective study using ED electronic health records (EHRs) from Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 (n = 184,653). The model integrates structured variables, such as vital signs, medication and laboratory counts, and ICD-10-based comorbidity measures, with unstructured physician notes. Key physiologic measurements were transformed into binary form using clinical reference intervals, and random under-sampling addressed class imbalance. A multimodal, CNN was proposed and evaluated with an 8:2 train-test split and 10-fold Monte Carlo cross-validation.
resultsThe proposed model achieved a sensitivity of 0.717 (CI: [0.695, 0.738]), accuracy of 0.846 (CI: [0.842, 0.850]), and AUROC of 0.853. Binary transformation improved recall and AUROC relative to the original numeric representations. SHAP analysis showed that unstructured features dominated prediction, while structured variables added complementary value. In a small-scale pilot evaluation using the SHAP-enabled interface, participating physicians reported the system helped surface high-risk cohorts and reduced cognitive workload by consolidating relevant patient information for rapid cross-checking.
conclusionsAn interpretable CNN-based clinical decision support system can predict ED revisit risk from multimodal EHR data and demonstrates practical usability in a real-world clinical setting, supporting targeted discharge planning and follow-up as a near-term approach to mitigate overcrowding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.