ReviewMicromachines2026
Soft Biomimetic Underwater Vehicles: A Review of Actuation Mechanisms, Structure Designs and Underwater Applications.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Deep-Sea Soft Bionic Fish: Advances in Pressure-Tolerant Design, Soft Actuation, and Autonomous Systems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for marine resource development and in-depth exploration of the marine environment has positioned soft biomimetic underwater vehicles (SBUVs) as a research hotspot in the fields of underwater equipment and soft robotics. SBUVs are characterized by bodies made of flexible and extensible materials, integrating the dual advantages of softness and biomimetics. They can achieve muscle-like continuous deformation to efficiently absorb collision energy, while mimicking the propulsion mechanisms of marine organisms-such as fish and jellyfish-through undulating body movements or cavity contraction and relaxation. Such biomimetic propulsion is highly compatible with the flexible actuation of soft materials, enabling excellent environmental adaptability while maintaining favorable propulsion efficiency. Compared with traditional rigid underwater vehicles, SBUVs offer higher degrees of freedom, superior environmental adaptability, enhanced impact resistance and greater motion flexibility. This review systematically summarizes typical actuation methods for SBUVs-including fluid-powered actuation, shape memory alloy actuation, and electroactive polymer actuation-elaborating on their working principles, key technological advances, and representative application cases on SBUVs. These actuation mechanisms each offer distinct advantages. Fluid-powered systems are valued for high power density and precise motion control through direct fluidic force transmission. Shape memory alloys provide high force output and accurate positional recovery via controlled thermal phase changes. Meanwhile, electroactive polymers stand out for their rapid (often millisecond-scale) dynamic response, low hysteresis, and fine, muscle-like deformation under electrical stimuli. Current challenges are also analyzed, such as limited actuation efficiency, material durability issues, and system integration difficulties. Despite these constraints, SBUVs show broad application prospects in marine resource exploration, ecological monitoring, and underwater engineering operations. Future research should prioritize the development of novel materials, coordinated optimization of actuation and control systems, and breakthroughs in core technologies to accelerate the practical implementation and industrialization of SBUVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.