ArticleMicromachines2026
Machine Learning-Enabled Prognostication of Tensile Strength in 316L Stainless Steel Through Additive Manufacturing Processes.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Manufacturing of Bioinspired SS316L-Based Multimaterials: Processing, Mechanical Properties and Modeling.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tensile strength of components fabricated through additive manufacturing processes is of paramount importance for their implementation in practical engineering applications. However, the intricacy of the process parameters renders the prediction of tensile strength a formidable challenge. In this scholarly work, a predictive model for the tensile strength of 316L stainless steel components produced via SLM was developed through the synergistic integration of CNN and RF. The model was trained on a dataset comprising 42 datasets and subsequently validated against 12 sets of experimental data. The model's predictive performance was quantified using MSE and MAE, which were recorded as 0.00295 and 0.0344, respectively. These values represent a reduction of 3.28% and 31.88% when compared to the predictive accuracy achieved by employing CNN in isolation. Furthermore, the correlation coefficient achieved a substantial increase of 74.18%, reaching a value of 0.9576, which is indicative of a high degree of accuracy in the model's predictive outcomes. With the same sample size, the incorporation of relative density and Vickers hardness as additional input conditions resulted in a reduction in prediction accuracy. The tensile strength prediction model presented herein demonstrates the capability for high-precision prediction even with small datasets, thereby offering a theoretical framework that may guide future endeavors in the prediction of mechanical properties for a broader spectrum of materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.