Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41753867›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2026

Machine Learning-Enabled Prognostication of Tensile Strength in 316L Stainless Steel Through Additive Manufacturing Processes.

Qing Gao, Congyu Wang, Jiayan Hu, Hongqin Ding, Jiajie Wang, Jie Bai, Haibo Xie, Huayong Yang, Yi Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qing GaoState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Congyu WangInstitute of Advanced Machines Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Jiayan HuState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Hongqin DingState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Jiajie WangInstitute of Advanced Machines Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Jie BaiState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Haibo XieState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Huayong YangState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Yi ZhuState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFB4602502National Natural Science Foundation of China 52005437National Natural Science Foundation of China 52222503Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LD22E050003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tensile strength of components fabricated through additive manufacturing processes is of paramount importance for their implementation in practical engineering applications. However, the intricacy of the process parameters renders the prediction of tensile strength a formidable challenge. In this scholarly work, a predictive model for the tensile strength of 316L stainless steel components produced via SLM was developed through the synergistic integration of CNN and RF. The model was trained on a dataset comprising 42 datasets and subsequently validated against 12 sets of experimental data. The model's predictive performance was quantified using MSE and MAE, which were recorded as 0.00295 and 0.0344, respectively. These values represent a reduction of 3.28% and 31.88% when compared to the predictive accuracy achieved by employing CNN in isolation. Furthermore, the correlation coefficient achieved a substantial increase of 74.18%, reaching a value of 0.9576, which is indicative of a high degree of accuracy in the model's predictive outcomes. With the same sample size, the incorporation of relative density and Vickers hardness as additional input conditions resulted in a reduction in prediction accuracy. The tensile strength prediction model presented herein demonstrates the capability for high-precision prediction even with small datasets, thereby offering a theoretical framework that may guide future endeavors in the prediction of mechanical properties for a broader spectrum of materials.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingconvolutional neural networksmachine learningrandom foresttensile strength

Identifiers

PMID41753867
PMCPMC12942722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.