ArticleMicromachines2026
Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on Polishing Fluid Dynamics and Material Removal in Metal Ultrasonic Vibration Polishing.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the bottleneck issues of traditional ultrasonic polishing-such as unclear material removal mechanisms for ductile metals and difficulties in controlling machining outcomes-this paper employs a combined approach of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation and non-contact fixed-point polishing experiments to systematically reveal the intrinsic relationship between the dynamic characteristics of the polishing flow field and the evolution of the material surface. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the cavitation effect significantly regulates the flow field structure: it not only confines the minimum pressure near the saturated vapor pressure but also markedly reduces the pressure peak while concurrently causing an overall decrease in flow velocity, forming a strongly coupled multi-parameter system of pressure, cavitation, and flow velocity. Experimental results indicate a clear spatial differentiation in the material removal mechanism: the central region is dominated by cavitation erosion, resulting in numerous pits and a 33.6% increase in residual compressive stress; the edge region is primarily governed by fluid-mechanical scraping, effectively improving surface finish and increasing residual stress by 22.3%; the transition zone, influenced by synergistic mechanisms, shows the smallest stress increase (19.7%). The enhancement of residual compressive stress can significantly improve the fatigue resistance of materials and prolong their fatigue life. This study comprehensively elucidates the multi-mechanism synergistic material removal process involving "cavitation impact, mechanical scraping, and fatigue spallation" in ultrasonic polishing, providing a key theoretical basis and process optimization direction for sub-micrometer ultra-precision machining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.