ArticleMicromachines2026
3D-Printed Microfluidic Chip System with Integrated Fluidic Breakers and Phaseguide Fluid Structures for Optimal Passive Mixing.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D printing offers great potential for rapid and cost-effective fabrication of microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems. Through a comparative approach, we implemented staggered herringbone mixer (SHM), Tesla mixer, and split and recombine mixer (SAR), along with a basic unperturbed channel into one chip and performed comparative mixing efficiency experiments. We also introduced a phaseguide-based, T-shaped stop structure at the Y-shaped inlets for bubble-free and parallel filling. The structures were analyzed with two poorly mixable dye solutions at flow rates ranging from 1 µL/min to 200 µL/min. The mixing efficiency was evaluated using optical gray value analysis and compared against diffusion-based mixing. The fluid-aligning phaseguides in the 3D-printed system were shown to work. Among the three different mixing structures tested, SHM exhibited the best mixing efficiency at all tested flow rates. Uniformly designed SHM structures contain a region of poor mixing between the two zones of turbulence. In a non-uniform design, fluid breakers were placed between two SHM units to redirect poorly mixed fluids to the edges, resulting in 100% mixing efficiency across all measured flow rates. These results, especially SHM with fluid breakers, support the development of cost-effective injection-molded lab-on-a-chip systems with improved mixing functionalities at close range instead of simple long-length meandric systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.