ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Antimicrobial Discovery: From Predictive Models to De Novo Design.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining antimicrobial resistance: AI-driven predictive epidemiology and the C-AMRE framework for next-generation antibiotic discovery.The Journal of antibiotics · 2026Review
- Improving Generalizability in Whole-Cell Antibiotic Discovery Through Active Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Antimicrobial Peptides and Smart Biomaterials in Chronic Wound Therapy: Overcoming Biofilms, Resistance, and Translational Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Smart Nano-Antibiotics: AI-Guided Stimuli-Responsive Nanoplatforms for Precision Antimicrobial Therapy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Data-Driven Engineering of Antimicrobial Nanomaterials for Food Safety and Biomedical Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microbial biobanking: safeguarding the tiny treasures for sustainable human welfare.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Discovery and Optimization of Antimicrobial Peptides Targeting ESKAPE Pathogens and Multidrug-Resistant Fungi.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Comprehensive genomics, systems, and structural assessment for novel target identification in penicillin-resistantFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Selected Domains of Drug Discovery: A Critical Narrative Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance represents one of the most critical global health challenges of the 21st century, urgently demanding innovative strategies for antimicrobial discovery. Traditional antibiotic development pipelines are slow, costly, and increasingly ineffective against multidrug-resistant pathogens. In this context, recent advances in artificial intelligence have emerged as transformative tools capable of accelerating antimicrobial discovery and expanding accessible chemical and biological space. This comprehensive review critically synthesizes recent progress in AI-driven approaches applied to the discovery and design of both small-molecule antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides. We examine how machine learning, deep learning, and generative models are being leveraged for virtual screening, activity prediction, mechanism-informed prioritization, and de novo antimicrobial design. Particular emphasis is placed on graph-based neural networks, attention-based and transformer architectures, and generative frameworks such as variational autoencoders and large language model-based generators. Across these approaches, AI has enabled the identification of structurally novel compounds, facilitated narrow-spectrum antimicrobial strategies, and improved interpretability in peptide prediction. However, significant challenges remain, including data scarcity and imbalance, limited experimental validation, and barriers to clinical translation. By integrating methodological advances with a critical analysis of the current limitations, this review highlights emerging trends and outlines future directions aimed at bridging the gap between in silico discovery and real-world therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.