Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41753659›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2026

Microbiological Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Poultry Carcass Excision Sampling Methods in Brazil.

Pricila Borges, Luciana Mena, Sandra Heidtmann, José Queluz, Natalia Lopes, Jaqueline Cruvinel, Michele Nesi, Juliana Schmitz, Anabile Lisboa, Viviane Colla and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pricila BorgesFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Luciana MenaFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Sandra HeidtmannFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
José QueluzFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Natalia LopesFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Jaqueline CruvinelFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Michele NesiFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Juliana SchmitzFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Anabile LisboaFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Viviane CollaFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Christiane HullerFood Company, São Paulo 04730-090, SP, Brazil.
Brunna DutraInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul-ICTA/UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0000-5178-9249
Eduardo TondoInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul-ICTA/UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6956-2827

Funding

BRF Company IAP-003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazil is among the world's leading exporters of chicken meat, and microbiological evaluation of carcasses is essential to verify process hygiene and safety. This study assessed the microbiological effectiveness and economic impact of two sampling methods for poultry carcasses: the excision of pooled samples of skin and muscle from multiple carcass regions, as recommended by Brazilian authorities, and the excision of neck skin alone. In accordance with Brazilian authorities guidelines requiring carcass evaluation through

Indexed as

chicken meatEnterobacteriaceaeneck skin

Identifiers

PMID41753659
PMCPMC12943070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.