ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Selected Materials-Building Façades in Poland.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of sustainable building materials is becoming increasingly important in order to reduce their environmental impact. This article draws attention to the lack of life cycle assessment (LCA) of building façades, which would take into account national conditions. The aim of the work is to assess the environmental impact of various building façade solutions. The analysis concerned a ventilated façade on an aluminum substructure with a fiber cement board and external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS) with expanded polystyrene (EPS). The assessed façades differed with regard to the used insulation materials. The study aims to select more ecological façades, while at the same time taking into account national conditions, which is important at the stage of designing a building. The study also aims to fill a gap in the existing literature by providing information concerning the environmental analysis of building façades based on real data. Based on a comparative analysis, it was shown that ETICSs with EPS have higher façade-damage category indicators in all impact categories except for eutrophication, human toxicity (carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic), and resource use related to minerals and metals, for which the ventilated façade shows higher values. Additionally, hot-spots for the analyzed façades were also presented. In the case of a ventilated façade, the determinant is the used insulating material, which is mineral wool. In the case of ETICS, it is the finish coat. For the first time in Poland, the LCA of a ventilated façade and ETICS was presented based on real data. The results of this study can be used as the first step of a full cradle-to-grave LCA for buildings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.