Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41753524›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Polyurethane Recycling: Sustainable Development Perspectives and Innovative Approaches.

Konrad Polecki, Joanna Paciorek-Sadowska, Marcin Borowicz, Marek Isbrandt, Iwona Zarzyka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konrad PoleckiDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethanes, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Kazimierz Wielki University, JK Chodkiewicza Street 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-7280-994X
Joanna Paciorek-SadowskaDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethanes, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Kazimierz Wielki University, JK Chodkiewicza Street 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0845-0404
Marcin BorowiczDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethanes, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Kazimierz Wielki University, JK Chodkiewicza Street 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-5244
Marek IsbrandtDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethanes, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Kazimierz Wielki University, JK Chodkiewicza Street 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3844-6951
Iwona ZarzykaDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszów University of Technology, Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyurethanes are widely used polymeric materials; their crosslinked structure and compositional diversity significantly hinder effective end-of-life management. The review emphasizes polyurethane recycling technologies, with chemical aspects discussed only insofar as they directly affect recyclability. The influence of polyol and isocyanate structure on phase separation, network architecture and thermal stability is discussed in the context of degradation and depolymerization mechanisms. Mechanical, chemical, thermochemical and emerging biological recycling routes are compared, with emphasis on their respective advantages, limitations and technological maturity. Mechanical recycling remains the most accessible option on an industrial scale but typically leads to reduced mechanical and thermal-insulation performance. Chemical recycling-particularly glycolysis, hydrolysis and aminolysis-enables partial recovery of polyols suitable for reuse in new polyurethane formulations, albeit at the cost of higher energy demand and increased process complexity. The environmental impact of polyurethane recycling is considered in terms of energy consumption, greenhouse-gas emissions, waste-reduction potential and alignment with circular-economy principles. Emerging biological and hybrid recycling strategies are highlighted as promising low-temperature alternatives with potential environmental benefits, despite their current low technological readiness. Key structural and technological barriers to efficient polyurethane recycling are identified, and future research directions toward improved sustainability and resource efficiency are outlined.

Indexed as

application of polyurethanespolyurethane materialspolyurethanesrecycling of polyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID41753524
PMCPMC12941759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.