ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Use of Citrus Peel Waste as Bio-Fillers in Polyester Resin Composites: Analysis of Mechanical Properties.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of global trends in sustainability and the circular economy (CE), this article aims to investigate the potential of microparticles derived from citrus peel waste (grapefruit, key lime, lemon, and orange), constituting approximately 50% of the fruit weight, as eco-friendly bio-fillers in polymer composites, thereby reducing the consumption of petrochemical resins. The composites were fabricated by gravity casting using polyester resin (PR) as the matrix at filler concentrations of 2.5%, 5%, and 10% by weight. Functional properties were assessed using static tensile testing (measuring Peak Load, Peak Stress, and Young's modulus) and Shore D hardness testing. The incorporation of unprocessed fillers generally decreased tensile strength (Peak Stress REF: 31.48 MPa), attributed to poor interfacial adhesion. The lowest Peak Stress value was recorded for the 2.5O composite (16.04 MPa). The exception was the 10K composite (10 wt.%key limee), which achieved a Peak Load (1.28 kN) nearly identical to the neat resin (1.29 kN), although the Peak Stress remained lower due to the reduced effective cross-sectional area. Stiffness (Young's modulus REF: 3.26 GPa) increased by more than 10 wt.% for 5G (3.63 GPa), indicating effective reinforcement at this concentration. A key positive finding was a universal increase in Shore D hardness across all biocomposites (REF: 78.4 ShD), with a maximum of 83.8 ShD for 10L (lemon), a typical response to rigid fillers that suggests enhanced surface resistance. The results suggest that citrus peel waste could be considered for non-structural applications where surface durability and efficient waste management are priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.