Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41753374›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Strategies for Enhancing Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement-A Short Review.

Ye Zhang, Jingwei He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of Titanium Dioxide (TiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ye ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.
Jingwei HeSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a reaction product formulated from glass powders and polycarboxylic acid aqueous solution. This material has garnered significant attention in restorative dentistry due to its favorable properties, including chemical adhesion to tooth structure, biocompatibility, and sustained fluoride release, coupled with its minimal pulp irritation. However, its low mechanical strength, high brittleness, and susceptibility to cracking limit its use in stress-bearing areas of teeth. To expand the clinical application scope of GIC and develop an "ideal" dental restorative material, enhancing traditional GIC is necessary. This narrative review summarizes the main strategies for enhancing GIC, covering modifications to both the powder and liquid components. The key findings indicate that incorporating reinforcing fillers into the powder or modifying the polyacid chemistry can significantly improve mechanical properties such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strength. Additionally, some modifications help maintain or enhance fluoride release. However, the translation of many laboratory-based improvements to clinical practice requires further validation. In conclusion, while numerous promising enhancement routes exist, future development should focus on synergistic approaches and rigorous clinical evaluation to advance towards high-performance, durable restorative materials.

Indexed as

filler enhancementglass ionomer cementmechanical propertiespolymer modificationresearch progress

Identifiers

PMID41753374
PMCPMC12941825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.