ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
A Clinician Perspective for a Personalized Approach to Management of Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia with Targeted Therapies Alone or in Combination.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Key mechanisms underlying immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) pathophysiology include impaired platelet production and macrophage-mediated platelet destruction, the latter of which is the disease driver in more than half of patients. Traditional sequential treatment approaches achieve suboptimal responses in many patients. This review summarizes ITP pathogenesis and the treatment landscape and proposes a personalized treatment approach for ITP after first-line treatment (corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, anti-D therapy) based on targeting underlying disease mechanisms with immunomodulatory and bone marrow-supportive therapies (fostamatinib, rituximab, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists [TPO-RAs]) prior to proceeding to later-line therapies. Clinical evidence of monotherapy and real-world studies of combination therapy are reviewed to support mechanism-based treatment selection, focusing on the complementary actions of fostamatinib (to target platelet destruction) and TPO-RAs (to stimulate platelet production). In prior studies, fostamatinib with or without TPO-RAs demonstrated durable platelet responses and manageable safety as second-line or later ITP treatment. The proposed treatment framework augments guidelines by recommending fostamatinib, rituximab, or TPO-RAs as second-line therapy options based on patient-specific disease characteristics and risks. Patients with inadequate response to fostamatinib or TPO-RA monotherapy may combine these therapies to address both platelet destruction and platelet production deficits. This novel framework tailors therapy to patient-specific pathophysiology by preferentially targeting both impaired platelet production and increased platelet destruction to support individualized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.