ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
From Promise to Practice: Harmonizing Telemedicine in Pediatric Chronic Respiratory Diseases.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine has the potential to substantially improve the care of children and adolescents with chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and chronic respiratory failure. Digital health interventions-such as remote monitoring, virtual consultations, adherence-support tools, and educational platforms-can enhance disease control, continuity of care, and access to specialized services. Despite these opportunities, the implementation of telemedicine in pediatric respiratory care remains fragmented and uneven across healthcare systems. A central barrier to progress is the marked heterogeneity of outcome measures used to evaluate telemedicine interventions. Inconsistent definitions, variable endpoints, and limited follow-up reduce comparability across studies, hinder evidence synthesis, and impede translation into clinical guidelines, reimbursement models, and policy decisions. Consequently, telemedicine is often confined to isolated pilot projects rather than embedded within standard care pathways. This narrative review issues a Call to Action for the coordinated implementation and harmonization of telemedicine in pediatric chronic respiratory diseases. We advocate for the urgent development and adoption of a Core Outcome Set (COS) to standardize outcome measurement across clinical trials and real-world evaluations. In addition, we highlight the importance of integrating implementation science, economic evaluation, ethical oversight, and equity considerations into telemedicine research and deployment. Addressing regulatory fragmentation, ensuring interoperability, and aligning accreditation with reimbursement and Health Technology Assessment requirements are essential for sustainable scale-up. Finally, we emphasize the need for international collaboration among clinicians, researchers, policymakers, payers, technology developers, and patient advocacy groups to accelerate learning and promote equitable, evidence-based digital care models. Through coordinated action, telemedicine can evolve from a promising innovation into a reliable and accessible standard of care for children with chronic respiratory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.