ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators in Women: What Do We Know, and What Is Still Missing.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Androgens and androgen receptor (AR) signaling influence many aspects of female physiology, including reproduction, musculoskeletal health, metabolism, and neurological regulation, yet are less studied than in males. Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) were developed to provide tissue-selective anabolic effects with reduced androgenic side effects, but their effects in women are not well defined. This narrative review summarizes preclinical and clinical evidence on SARM use in female rodents and women, focusing on AR biology, tissue selectivity, therapeutic potential, and safety. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified relevant experimental and clinical studies addressing sex-specific AR signaling and SARM effects in females. Preclinical data indicate that SARMs can enhance sexual motivation and improve muscle and bone outcomes in ovariectomized models, with compound-dependent effects on reproductive tissues. Clinical studies in postmenopausal women demonstrate increases in lean body mass with generally limited androgenic effects, although functional benefits are inconsistent and alterations in lipid profiles and liver enzymes have been reported. Evidence also supports antitumor activity of AR-targeted SARMs in selected breast cancer subtypes. Overall, while SARMs show therapeutic potential in women, long-term safety and efficacy remain insufficiently characterized, warranting further sex-specific clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.