ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Occlusion Break Surge and Anterior Chamber Stability in the Intraocular Environment of Modern Phacoemulsification: A Narrative Review.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postoperative Aqueous Flare in Diabetic Eyes and Fluidics-Related Surgical Parameters After Cataract Surgery Using the Eight-Chop Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phacoemulsification is performed within a highly dynamic intraocular environment, in which fluid exchange, pressure regulation, and tissue biomechanics interact continuously. Although modern cataract surgery is considered safe and efficient, disruption of this delicate intraoperative microenvironment remains a major source of complications. Among fluidics-related events, post-occlusion break surge represents one of the most critical destabilizing factors of the anterior chamber. A surge occurs when the sudden release of an occluded aspiration port generates an abrupt pressure-volume imbalance that cannot be immediately compensated by infusion, leading to a transient collapse of the intraocular environment. This narrative review integrates current experimental and clinical evidence on the pathophysiology, quantification, and technological control of surge, framing it as a model of environmentally driven intraoperative stress. The evolution of phacoemulsification fluidics, from gravity-based systems to active, adaptive, and predictive platforms, is analyzed in relation to their ability to preserve a stable and physiologic intraocular environment. Comparative data from contemporary devices are reviewed, highlighting differences in surge volume, recovery time, and pressure restitution. Special emphasis is placed on the impact of surge on the microenvironments of both the anterior and posterior segments, including endothelial stress, capsular instability, vitreoretinal traction, and macular perfusion. Emerging strategies such as handpiece-integrated pressure sensors, predictive fluidics algorithms, intraoperative imaging, and artificial intelligence are reshaping environmental control during surgery. Despite substantial technological progress, the complete elimination of surge remains an unmet need. Continued innovation, standardized biomechanical models, and robust clinical validation will be essential to further protect the intraoperative intraocular environment and improve long-term visual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.