ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Ankle Bracing as a Public Health Game Changer: A Narrative Review on the Prevention of Ankle Injuries in Basketball Players.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Compensatory Effects of Joint Bracing From a Kinetic Chain Perspective: Lower Limb Movement Coordination Analysis During Badminton Lunge Movements.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ankle injuries are among the most common sports injuries in basketball and represent a substantial public health and economic burden. This narrative review synthesises evidence on ankle bracing as external protective support and shows that ankle braces reduce the risk of both first-time injuries and ankle re-injuries in basketball players without significantly affecting sport-specific performance, such as sprinting, jumping, or changing direction. Similarly, despite earlier theoretical concerns, current evidence shows no increased risk of knee injury associated with the use of ankle bracing. Mechanistic studies indicate that protection is provided by limiting excessive frontal-plane motion, enhancing proprioceptive feedback, and increasing perceived joint stability. Economic analyses show that a single ankle injury generates considerable direct and indirect costs, whereas seasonal team-wide ankle bracing programmes are low cost per athlete and likely cost-effective at scale. As a public health measure, ankle bracing is practical and easily scalable in community and sports settings. Overall, routine ankle bracing is shown to be a feasible, low-cost strategy for primary and secondary prevention of ankle injuries in basketball without compromising performance, and may support broader participation goals aligned with Sport for All principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.