ReviewInsects2026
The Evolution of Modeling Approaches: From Statistical Models to Deep Learning for Locust and Grasshopper Forecasting.
Review in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Locust outbreaks cause a significant threat to global food security and ecosystem stability, with particularly severe consequences in grassland regions, where grasshoppers also exert considerable ecological pressure. In comparison to grasshoppers, locusts typically occur at much larger spatial scales, as their strong migratory ability and collective movement behavior lead to greater spatial connectivity and autocorrelation. The forecasting of both locust and grasshopper outbreaks remains a formidable scientific challenge, primarily due to the complex, nonlinear spatiotemporal interactions among environmental drivers such as weather, vegetation, and soil conditions. This review compares the evolution of prediction methodologies for locust and grasshopper outbreaks, focusing on the application of deep learning (DL) methods to ecological forecasting tasks. It traces the development from traditional statistical models to classical machine learning, and ultimately to DL, assessing the strengths and limitations of key DL architectures-including Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs)-in modeling the intricate dynamics of locust populations. While most studies have concentrated on locust outbreaks, this review emphasizes the adaptation of these models to grassland ecosystems, such as those in Inner Mongolia, where grasshopper outbreaks exhibit similarities to locust plagues but have been largely overlooked in DL research. Despite the potential of DL, challenges such as data scarcity, limited model generalizability across regions, and the "black box" issue of low interpretability remain. To address these issues, we propose future research directions that integrate Explainable AI (XAI), transfer learning, and generative models like GANs to development more robust, transparent, and ecologically grounded forecasting tools. By promoting the use of efficient architectures like GRUs within customized frameworks, this review aims to guide the development of effective early warning systems for sustainable locust management in vulnerable grassland ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.