Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752560›Full record

ArticleInsects2026

Intraguild Predation and Chemical Cue Responses Between

Fatma Sh Kalmosh, Bo Zhang, Nikola Đukić, Abdulaziz Alamri, Salman Alrokayan, Xuenong Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatma Sh KalmoshDepartment of Field Crops and Cotton Mites, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza 12618, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-6889
Bo ZhangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7811-8584
Nikola ĐukićInstitute for Medicinal Plants Research "Dr. Josif Pančić", 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-6449
Abdulaziz AlamriBiochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-3942-5455
Salman AlrokayanResearch Chair of Biomedical Applications of Nanomaterials, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Xuenong XuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-3078

Funding

King Saud University (ORF-RC-2025-2600)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species sharing the same trophic level can interact not only through competition for resources but also through intraguild predation (IGP). Therefore, an important step toward implementing successful multiple predator releases in biological control strategies requires resolving how predators respond to the presence of heterogeneous competitors. This study examined the compatibility of two predatory mites,

Indexed as

chemical cuesforaging behaviorintraguild predationpredator–prey–plant interactionspredatory mites

Identifiers

PMID41752560
PMCPMC12940915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.