In one paragraphArticle in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
8 authors.
Agnieszka Kaliniak-DziuraDepartment of Quality Assessment and Processing of Animal Products, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-1974 Marek KowalczykDepartment of Quality Assessment and Processing of Animal Products, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-4468 Monika ZiomekDepartment of Food Hygiene of Animal Origin, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1332-4026 Piotr SkałeckiDepartment of Quality Assessment and Processing of Animal Products, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9383-1863 Piotr DomaradzkiDepartment of Quality Assessment and Processing of Animal Products, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6917-571X Ewa PoleszakChair and Department of Applied and Social Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 1, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-3953 Jarosław SzponarClinical Department of Toxicology and Cardiology, Stefan Wyszynski Regional Specialist Hospital in Lublin, 100 Al. Kraśnicka, 20-550 Lublin, Poland.
Mariusz FlorekDepartment of Quality Assessment and Processing of Animal Products, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0941-1714 Funding
Minister of Science and Higher Education of Poland "Regional Initiative of Excellence" in 2019-2023 project number 029/RID/2018/19 funding amount 11 927 330.00 PLN
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The study aimed to assess the influence of two packaging methods (under vacuum, VP vs. air, AP) on the quality of fish balls from carp (
Indexed as
CarpsFood PackagingFood PreservationFood StorageSeafoodAirAnimalsFood MicrobiologyFood, ProcessedThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesVacuumThiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substancescarp (Cyprinus carpio)fish ballsfood qualityfood safetyfood shelf lifepackagingrefrigerated storagevacuum packaging
Identifiers
PMID41752523
PMCPMC12942997
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390