ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sorbent Strip Microextraction as a Practical Tool for Drug Screening: Application to Opioids and Local Anesthetics in Human Urine.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present contribution proposes a new design for adsorptive microextraction devices that promote a user-friendly and greener analytical approach. Novel Sorbent Strip Microextraction (SSμE) devices were made using a flexible adhesive film coated with convenient sorbents. Comparing the previous adsorptive microextraction devices, i.e., bar adsorptive microextraction and multi-sphere adsorptive microextraction, the main advantage of the sorbent strip device is its simple design and reduced device preparation time and waste. To demonstrate its applicability, three opioids (buprenorphine, tapentadol, and tramadol) and two local anesthetics (articaine and bupivacaine) were used as model compounds in urine matrices, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) analysis. Key parameters such as sorbent type, desorption conditions, and microextraction variables were systematically optimized by experimental designs. Under the final conditions, the method achieved recoveries ranging from 78% to 108%, trueness within ±7% and precision expressed by relative standard deviation below 13%. The technique demonstrated good linearity (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.