Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752355›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Peer-Led Models Focussed on Emotional Distress and Suicide Prevention: A Scoping Review.

Dianna G Smith, Mel Giugni, Amelia Gulliver, Scott J Fitzpatrick, Heather Lamb, Louise A Ellis, Erin Oldman, Helen T Oni, Caroline Allen, Michelle Banfield

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dianna G SmithCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-2272
Mel GiugniCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Amelia GulliverCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-9844
Scott J FitzpatrickCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Heather LambCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8873-4011
Louise A EllisCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Erin OldmanRoses in the Ocean, Newstead, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-8980-7300
Helen T OniSonder, Elizabeth, SA 5112, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4616-0889
Caroline AllenIndependent Lived Experience Consultant, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Michelle BanfieldCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3024-1687

Funding

Australian Government Department of Health na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicidality is a significant and persistent public health concern, and people who are suicidal report negative experiences with clinical services. Peer-based interventions are a rapidly growing component of mental health care and suicide prevention. This scoping review's aim is to identify, summarise and synthesise the design, features and evidence for peer-led models and interventions for people experiencing emotional distress or suicidal crisis. This study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines. Online databases were searched in May 2022 and in October 2024. A total of 59 papers were identified. The scoping review provides an overview of key components of service models and interventions. In general, peer-led programs were widely accepted, with participants reporting positive improvements to mood, social connectedness, communication and coping skills. Despite the importance of training and supervision, a review of training content revealed a discordance between training and peer work principles in some cases. A concentration on facilitation of the service model or intervention rather than on the peer model itself meant there was limited information on the empirical and ethical arguments that supported the model of care. Future research is needed on peer-led models and how involvement and engagement of peers, consumers and carers can positively influence the planning, design, implementation and evaluation of new service models and interventions.

Indexed as

Peer GroupPsychological DistressSuicide PreventionHumanscrisisdistressmodels of carepeer workscoping reviewsuicidesuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID41752355
PMCPMC12941041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.