Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752339›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Strengthening Civil Registration Through Grassroots Health Institutions in India.

Sheetal Verma, Somnath Jana, Ritul Kamal, Laxmi Kant Dwivedi, Shiva S Halli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheetal VermaDepartment of Survey Research & Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India.
Somnath JanaDepartment of Survey Research & Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0009-0000-5870-5247
Ritul KamalDirectorate of Census Operations, Lucknow 226024, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Laxmi Kant DwivediDepartment of Survey Research & Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9737-2844
Shiva S HalliCollege of Community and Global Health, Institute for Global Public Health, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Civil registration of births and deaths underpins people's legal identity, access to essential services, and evidence-based policy. Over the last two decades, the expansion of the National Health Mission (NHM) and the dramatic increase in institutional deliveries have created new opportunities to link maternal healthcare with critical event documentation. Primary health centres (PHCs) and community health centres (CHCs), which are frequently the initial point of contact for rural households, are emerging as important places for birthing and registration. Despite their expanding importance, the particular role of these grassroots facilities in birth registration results has not been thoroughly investigated. This study addresses that gap by assessing their role in increasing registration coverage among children under the age of five. We analyzed nationally representative data from the National Family Health Survey rounds 4 (2015-2016) and 5 (2019-2021). This study focused on children under five, examining the association between place of delivery and registration status. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression estimated the odds of registration across delivery settings. Pooled data from both survey rounds captured temporal shifts, and predicted probabilities were calculated for institutional deliveries, adjusting for socio-demographic covariates. The proportion of institutional births occurring in PHCs and CHCs rose from 30.5% to 34.7% between the two survey rounds. Registration among children delivered in these facilities increased from 80.8% to 90.2%, the highest gain among all delivery settings. Regression analysis showed that births in PHCs/CHCs were associated with 38% higher odds of being registered compared to private facilities. States designating PHCs and CHCs as official registrars, such as Delhi, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh, reported the greatest improvements. Lower-level government health facilities are not only advancing safe delivery but also acting as pivotal nodes for civil registration. Their dual function creates a scalable model for integrating healthcare with legal identity creation, supporting equity and accelerating progress toward Sustainable Development Goal 16.9.

Indexed as

Birth CertificatesCommunity Health CentersRegistriesChild, PreschoolDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, Newbornbirth registrationcivil registration systeminstitutional deliverieslegal identity

Identifiers

PMID41752339
PMCPMC12940596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.