ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Clinicogenomic Insights for Progression-Free Survival in Prostate Cancer.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PrCa), the second most common cancer diagnosed in men globally, remains a critical challenge in precision oncology. While PrCa can be deadly, it is highly treatable if detected early. Identifying associative factors influencing disease progression risks can help inform preliminary steps that will further the expedition of clinical therapeutic intervention decisions, which will improve treatment outcomes. While conventional PrCa progression assessment tools rely heavily on a few clinical parameters, the importance of genomic information is increasingly recognized. In this study, we evaluate the prognostic value of patients' clinicogenomic profiles in modeling progression-free survival (PFS) of PrCa. Three survival models, namely the penalized Cox model, random survival forest, and a deep learning survival neural network, were deployed with extensive tuning applied to a dataset for a cohort of 494 patients with PrCa. This dataset, compiled from public data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) accessed via cBioPortal, consists of relevant clinical features and single-nucleotide variant information on likely PrCa-related genes. The survival models demonstrated satisfactory discriminatory performance, with Harrell's concordance index ranging from approximately 0.80 to 0.87 on held-out test data, indicating their ability to rank patients according to their relative progression risk among patients, while exhibiting distinct dynamics, all three models consistently identified clinical variables that indicated neoadjuvant treatment history, neoplasm cancer status, and tumor recurrence as well as the gene
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.