Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752320›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Towards Caring Technologies in Older Adult Care Through the Co-Creation of an Ethical Process Guide.

Elisabeth Honinx, Cato van Schyndel, Arend Roos, Emily Paulding, Toni Wright, Kathleen Galvin, Theofanis Fotis, Jorg Huber, Erik Laes, Nathalie Lambrechts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elisabeth HoninxVlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Cato van SchyndelVlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7969-613X
Arend RoosDigiRehab Nederland, 4334 EH Middelburg, The Netherlands.
Emily PauldingKent County Council, West Malling ME19 4AE, UK.
Toni WrightSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, Allied and Public Health, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury CT1 1QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-8879
Kathleen GalvinSchool of Education, Sports & Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN1 9PH, UK.
Theofanis FotisSchool of Education, Sports & Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN1 9PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8885-040X
Jorg HuberSchool of Education, Sports & Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN1 9PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-5745
Erik LaesVlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6118-4550
Nathalie LambrechtsVlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-0483

Funding

Interreg 2 Seas 2S07-018 EMPOWERCARE 2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As populations age, the gap between care needs and available support systems is widening, leading to critical vulnerabilities in staffing, infrastructure, and funding. The need for accessible, human-centred, and ethically grounded care technologies is growing. However, the development of digital health tools often lacks inclusivity and practical guidance. Existing ethical frameworks tend to remain abstract, which limits their real-world application. This study examines how such frameworks support the responsible development and implementation of caring technologies in older adult care. To achieve this, in-depth interviews were conducted with care providers, technology developers, and policymakers from partner organisations of the EMPOWERCARE project in the four participating countries: the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium and France. A core challenge was the limited applicability of abstract ethical principles in daily care settings. While existing initiatives often define ethical domains, few offer a structured, actionable process to guide implementation in practice. The proposed guide responds with a step-by-step structure, practical examples, and participatory tools to support inclusive, value-driven technology adoption. It is envisioned both as an implementation aid and a quality label to align stakeholders. Future research should validate the guide's usability, explore its role across care contexts, and examine how ethics can be more firmly embedded in innovation governance.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedAgedBelgiumDigital HealthFranceHumansNetherlandsUnited Kingdomcaring technologydigital healtholder adult careprocess guideresponsible innovation

Identifiers

PMID41752320
PMCPMC12940666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.