Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752307›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Antimicrobial Use and Manure Management Practices Among Commercial Chicken Farmers in Selected Regions of Tanzania: Gaps and Strategies for Mitigating Antimicrobial Resistance.

Fares J Biginagwa, Alexanda Mzula, Erica Westwood, Sunday O Ochai, Hezron E Nonga, Anders Dalsgaard, Robinson H Mdegela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fares J BiginagwaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3015, Tanzania.ORCID 0009-0008-4105-3201
Alexanda MzulaDepartment of Microbiology, Parasitology & Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3015, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-3282-4560
Erica WestwoodICARS, International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Ørestads Boulevard 5, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sunday O OchaiICARS, International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Ørestads Boulevard 5, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hezron E NongaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3015, Tanzania.
Anders DalsgaardICARS, International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Ørestads Boulevard 5, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robinson H MdegelaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3015, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-1498-8892

Funding

International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions (ICARS) DVMPH027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensification of commercial chicken production has increased antimicrobial use and manure generation, raising concerns about residues and resistant pathogens entering the environment. Use of raw chicken manure can introduce antimicrobial compounds and resistance determinants into agricultural soils. This study examined antimicrobial use and manure management practices among chicken farmers in Morogoro, Dar es Salaam, and Unguja, and identified key gaps in national regulatory frameworks and their on-farm implementation. A structured questionnaire was administered to 351 farmers to assess the types and usage of antimicrobials and manure handling practices. Farmers reported using fourteen antibiotic classes and four antiparasitic agents, with tetracycline being the most frequently used (54.1%). Most farmers in Unguja (97.7%), Dar es Salaam (87.3%), and Morogoro (70.9%) either apply manure as fertilizer, sell it, or both. A large proportion (93.2%) reported that they do not process manure before use or sale, mainly due to lack of technical knowledge (77.4%). Awareness of the health hazards posed by pathogens (43.3%) and drug residues (57.5%) is low. This study revealed critical gaps, including weak regulatory enforcement, inadequate surveillance systems, limited cross-sectoral integration, irrational antimicrobial use, and limited farmer awareness. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving farmer training, and promoting safer manure management methods are recommended to reduce the environmental dissemination of antimicrobial residues and resistance.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsDrug Resistance, MicrobialManureAnimalsChickensFarmersHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsManureantimicrobial resistance driverscommercial chickenmanure management

Identifiers

PMID41752307
PMCPMC12940919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.