ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
A Descriptive Thematic Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Recommendations for Cancer Screening Uptake Among Community Dwelling Adults with Mental Ill-Health.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The much higher rate of premature mortality from cancer among people with mental ill-health is a major contributor to 20-year reduction in life expectancy for this population, relative to the broader population. Under-screening and delays in screening for cancers are recognized as significant issues contributing to this health inequality. This thematic review explored the common barriers to delayed cancer screening, facilitators to overcome those barriers, and the associated recommendations to improve screening rates for people with mental ill-health. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods studies and reviews, available in English, involving adults with mental ill-health (experiencing mental distress or with diagnosed mental disorder), living in the community and in contact with primary, secondary or tertiary mental health services, exploring their screening experiences for any type of cancer. The reviewed literature from 37 studies that met the inclusion criteria highlighted key themes contributing to the health disparity experienced by this population, including social determinants of health, comorbidities, and health system factors. Facilitators such as trust, support, self-care, and interventions at a health system level were also highlighted. Study quality was appraised using the MMAT v.18 and CASP tools. All studies that met the inclusion criteria, regardless of quality, were included in the review to provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on this topic. Building upon this literature, further recommendations are presented on how to reduce the cancer screening inequality experienced by people with mental ill-health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.