Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752271›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Effective Interventions to Prevent Breastfeeding-Related Nipple-Areolar Lesions: A Systematic Review.

Ana Chagas, Fernanda Moura, Monise Bispo, Lays Medeiros, Isabelle Costa, Rhayssa Araújo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana ChagasDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9050-3511
Fernanda MouraDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil.
Monise BispoDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil.
Lays MedeirosDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil.
Isabelle CostaDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1476-8702
Rhayssa AraújoDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5068-2906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study synthesizes the evidence on effective interventions for the prevention of breastfeeding-related nipple-areolar injuries. A systematic review was performed and guided by the evidence synthesis manual of the Joan Briggs Institute, carried out in six databases, with only intervention studies. Interventions with a positive outcome for the prevention of nipple-areolar lesions were considered effective. Methodological quality was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. The final sample of 14 articles found the following to be effective strategies: educational practices (simulations and demonstrations of the breastfeeding technique, with a qualified professional or by video) and the use of peppermint (aqueous solution or gel), extra virgin olive oil, honey, guaiazulene ointment, and venix caseosa. Each intervention was used in specific situations and ways, which should be considered for use in clinical practice. The interventions discussed can help prevent nipple-areolar lesions and breastfeeding difficulties, encouraging breastfeeding.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingNipplesFemaleHumansbreastfeedingnipplesnursingprimary preventionwounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID41752271
PMCPMC12941037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.