ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Exploring Learning Engagement in Rural and Urban Nursing Placements: A Five-Year Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Professional experience placements are a requirement for undergraduate nursing students enabling real world skill development. Barriers to meaningful and positive placements have previously been reported, however there is limited research on how the location of placement impacts the student experience and outcomes. This study investigates the placement experiences of undergraduate nursing students at the University of Tasmania (UTAS) over a five-year period, with a focus on urban versus rural settings and year-level differences. Findings reveal that over one-third of students reported constructive placement experiences, with rural placements yielding slightly more positive outcomes than urban ones. First-year students were more likely to report constructive experiences compared to their senior counterparts, suggesting that longer placement durations may contribute to increased dissatisfaction. Quality of placement-defined by supervision and skill development-emerged as the most influential factor in shaping student experiences. While most students praised the quality of supervision, third-year students expressed both the highest praise and criticism. Opportunities for clinical and interpersonal skill development were central to students' perceptions of placement quality, with rural placements slightly outperforming urban in skill development. However, some students, particularly in later years, felt that certain venues lacked adequate opportunities for skill acquisition. The study underscores the importance of high-quality supervision and appropriate clinical settings in enhancing placement experiences and suggests that constructive placements are more conducive to learning. These insights can inform strategies to improve the educational value of nursing placements across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.