ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Barriers to Regular Eye Examination in Individuals with Diabetes at a Tertiary Diabetes Centre in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of vision impairment and a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the barriers affecting diabetic retinopathy screening among people with diabetes mellitus.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between April and October 2024 at the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics. Data collection was performed using a structured, validated electronic questionnaire adapted from previous studies. Sample size calculation was carried out before data collection. Data were collected using a structured electronic questionnaire. A total of 998 responses were included in the study. The collected data incorporated sociodemographic characteristics, diabetes history, screening practices, and reported barriers. Descriptive and categorical data analyses were performed.
resultsOf 998 participants, 82% were over 50 years old, 79% had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 30% had never had an eye examination. Diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed in 12%. The main barriers to regular attendance among those previously screened (699) were as follows: lack of awareness of its importance (11%), believing that being asymptomatic made screening unnecessary (19%), and transportation difficulties (14%). Among those never screened (299), 56% lacked awareness, 62% believed being asymptomatic negates the need for screening, and 13% faced transportation difficulties. Age > 50 years, higher educational level, availability of health insurance, longer duration of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and HbA
conclusionsPublic health strategies should enhance the education provided to people and physician-person communication and remove logistical obstacles to improve screening compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.