Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752227›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Current Evidence and Considerations for Psychological Support Interventions for Fathers in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Alyssa R Morris, Anahit Sarin-Gulian, Catherine Mogil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alyssa R MorrisDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0100-6995
Anahit Sarin-GulianDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Catherine MogilDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-349X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of focus on psychological support for fathers in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), both in research and practice, with fathers receiving far less support from NICU providers as compared with mothers. This article aims to discuss the current literature and limitations related to providing psychological support to fathers in the NICU and proposes short- and long-term efforts for improving psychological care for NICU fathers. We conducted a narrative literature review to summarize interventions for supporting fathers in the NICU, including emotional support, educational support, social support, family-integrated care, and multi-component interventions. While initial work is promising, there are major limitations. Very few studies have examined interventions specific to providing support to fathers in the NICU, and little work has investigated differences in the support needs and responses to interventions for NICU fathers as compared with mothers. Fathers have historically been overlooked in the NICU. Given the growing recognition of paternal mental health challenges and their impact on infant development, there is a pressing need for efforts aimed at supporting fathers in the NICU. Efforts must consider system structure, policy, multidisciplinary training, and implementation protocols to improve the quality of care provided to NICU fathers.

Indexed as

FathersIntensive Care Units, NeonatalSocial SupportHumansInfant, NewbornMalecaregiversfathersintegrated delivery of health caremental healthneonatal intensive care unitsnewborn infantpaternitypolicypsychological stresspsychosocial intervention

Identifiers

PMID41752227
PMCPMC12940927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.