Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752111›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Quantitative Flow Cytometry-Medical Applications with a Focus on Blood Platelets.

Philippe Poncelet, Thomas Lecompte, Anne Bauters, François Mullier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philippe PonceletR and T Department, BioCytex, 13010 Marseille, France.
Thomas LecompteFaculté de Médecine, Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3269-6156
Anne BautersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (CHU Lille), 59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2734-456X
François MullierDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, CHU UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6947-6099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry, measuring light signals, can be used as a quantitative tool to appreciate the numbers of cell-surface molecules targeted with monoclonal antibodies, among other applications. This has been extensively used for blood cells and especially platelets. This review describes how techniques have evolved over time since the first developments of quantitative flow cytometry at the end of the 20th century. Technological issues are first described, applicable to all types of cells/molecules and largely relying on calibration beads with direct or, preferably, indirect immunofluorescence. The platelet field is then addressed with specific tools devoted to surface antigen quantitation. The array of commercially available kits is provided with their specificity. A panorama of platelet antigens quantified that can be used in the diagnosis workout of platelet disorders is then provided, accompanied by a reminder of the impressive stability of marker expression in normal individuals. Variations are then considered in the light of aging or genetic polymorphisms. Finally, the upcoming use of platelet antigen quantification as a monitoring tool for emerging targeted therapies is evoked. All in all, this review provides a comprehensive story of the evolution of the still too marginally used cell antigen quantification.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsFlow CytometryAnimalsAntigens, Human PlateletBlood Platelet DisordersHumansAntigens, Human Plateletplateletsquantitative flow cytometrysurface antigens

Identifiers

PMID41752111
PMCPMC12940865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.