Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752108›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

A Systematic Review of Major Advances in Breast Cancer Therapeutics in 2025: Synthesis of Conference and Published Evidence.

Nabil Ismaili

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Turmoil and breakthroughs: Highlights and growing pains in breast cancer therapy 2025Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Early- versus late-onset mortality trends in breast and female genital cancers in Spain, 1999-2024.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nabil IsmailiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI Faculty of Medicine, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), Casablanca 82403, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-5134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The year 2025 has been transformative in breast oncology, marked by the maturation of pivotal adjuvant trials, the introduction of novel ADCs, and the validation of proactive biomarker-driven strategies across all molecular subtypes. ASCO, ESMO, and SABCS contributed pivotal updates that further refined treatment paradigms. This systematic review synthesizes and critically evaluates pivotal Phase II/III clinical trials presented at major oncology conferences (ASCO 2025, ESMO 2025, SABCS 2025) and published in high-impact journals during 2025. A curated selection of pivotal Phase II/III trials, and major prospective trials published or presented in 2025 was performed. Data extraction focused on trial design, population, interventions, efficacy endpoints, and safety outcomes. Narrative synthesis was organized by disease stage and molecular subtype. Key 2025 findings (50 clinical trials) include: (1) confirmation of overall survival benefit with adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (monarchE: HR = 0.842,

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCamptothecinFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesTrastuzumabAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinImmunoconjugatesTrastuzumabtrastuzumab deruxtecanantibody-drug conjugateASCO 2025biomarkersbreast cancerCDK4/6 inhibitorESMO 2025precision medicineSABCS 2025systematic review

Identifiers

PMID41752108
PMCPMC12941040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.