ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Omics-Based Functional Fingerprinting of Nanoparticles in Cancer: Toward Predictive Nanomedicine.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA damage in the leukocytes of nanocomposite-exposed workers.Mutagenesis · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential Impact of Nanoparticles on Fetal Development: An Updated Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticles are widely explored in oncology as delivery platforms for cytotoxic drugs and molecularly defined therapeutic agents, including immunomodulators. While advances in nanomaterial engineering have enabled precise control over physicochemical properties, biological responses to nanoparticles remain difficult to predict and often diverge across experimental systems. Recent omics studies reveal that nanoparticle exposure induces coordinated cellular programs that extend beyond overt toxicity and are strongly shaped by delivery context, cellular state, and microenvironmental conditions. Importantly, these responses cannot be attributed solely to the payload, as nanocarriers themselves frequently engage stress, metabolic, and immune-related pathways, giving rise to non-additive and context-dependent effects. This Perspective proposes omics-based functional fingerprinting as a conceptual framework to interpret nanoparticle biology in cancer. Functional fingerprints are defined as integrated biological response states arising from nanocarrier-payload systems and resolving through transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and emerging single-cell or spatial approaches. By explicitly distinguishing carrier-dependent, payload-induced, and composite response programs, functional fingerprinting provides a means to reconcile heterogeneous observations and move beyond material-centered classification. Incorporating biological resolution and context awareness into nanoparticle profiling is expected to improve mechanistic interpretation, safety assessment, and the rational design of more predictive nanomedicine strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.