ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Role of the Clock Drawing Test in Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical Findings in Relation to CSF Biomarkers.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of neurocognitive disorder, and the integration of cognitive assessment with biological markers remains essential for clinical characterization. The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief and widely used screening tool assessing visuospatial and executive functions, which may reflect underlying neurodegenerative processes. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of the CDT and its association with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers within the A/T/(N) research framework. Ninety-seven patients with mild or major neurocognitive disorder were classified as AD or non-AD according to CSF amyloid-β, phosphorylated tau, and total tau profiles, and compared with 36 healthy participants. All subjects underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, including the CDT scored using the quantitative-qualitative method proposed by Rouleau et al. Group comparisons, ROC analyses, and regression models adjusted for age, sex, and education were performed. CDT scores effectively distinguished patients from healthy participants, showing large effect sizes, and modestly differentiated AD from non-AD profiles, particularly on the Hands subscale. Diagnostic accuracy was fair, with adjusted AUC values ranging from 0.65 to 0.75. Lower CDT performance was significantly associated with higher CSF total tau levels, while associations with amyloid-β and phosphorylated tau were not robust after correction. These findings suggest that the CDT is sensitive to cognitive impairment severity and shows limited but meaningful relationships with neurodegenerative biomarkers, supporting its role as a practical complementary tool alongside biological assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.