Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751927›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Role of the Clock Drawing Test in Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical Findings in Relation to CSF Biomarkers.

Aurora Cermelli, Chiara Lombardo, Alberto Mario Chiarandon, Fausto Roveta, Elisa Maria Piella, Virginia Batti, Elisa Rubino, Innocenzo Rainero, Silvia Boschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aurora CermelliAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-9288
Chiara LombardoCenter for Cognitive Disorders and Dementias (CDCD), Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-1495-0954
Alberto Mario ChiarandonAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-0529-6994
Fausto RovetaAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-7819
Elisa Maria PiellaAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0706-3632
Virginia BattiAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Elisa RubinoAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Innocenzo RaineroAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6074-9628
Silvia BoschiAging Brain and Memory Clinic, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1610-1917

Funding

Fondazione CRT 105128/2023.0366)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of neurocognitive disorder, and the integration of cognitive assessment with biological markers remains essential for clinical characterization. The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief and widely used screening tool assessing visuospatial and executive functions, which may reflect underlying neurodegenerative processes. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of the CDT and its association with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers within the A/T/(N) research framework. Ninety-seven patients with mild or major neurocognitive disorder were classified as AD or non-AD according to CSF amyloid-β, phosphorylated tau, and total tau profiles, and compared with 36 healthy participants. All subjects underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, including the CDT scored using the quantitative-qualitative method proposed by Rouleau et al. Group comparisons, ROC analyses, and regression models adjusted for age, sex, and education were performed. CDT scores effectively distinguished patients from healthy participants, showing large effect sizes, and modestly differentiated AD from non-AD profiles, particularly on the Hands subscale. Diagnostic accuracy was fair, with adjusted AUC values ranging from 0.65 to 0.75. Lower CDT performance was significantly associated with higher CSF total tau levels, while associations with amyloid-β and phosphorylated tau were not robust after correction. These findings suggest that the CDT is sensitive to cognitive impairment severity and shows limited but meaningful relationships with neurodegenerative biomarkers, supporting its role as a practical complementary tool alongside biological assessment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersNeuropsychological TestsAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesCase-Control StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC Curvetau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseA/T/(N) systembiomarkersClock Drawing Testcognitive impairmentdiagnostic accuracyneuropsychological assessment

Identifiers

PMID41751927
PMCPMC12940342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.