ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Differentiation Syndrome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Spectrum, and Emerging Therapeutic Paradigms.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by differentiation arrest, driving blast proliferation, and abnormal blood formation. While differentiation therapy revolutionized acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO), its extension into non-APL AML has been limited until recent targeted agents. This narrative review synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence into differentiation-inducing therapy, with a focus on IDH1/2, FLT3 and menin inhibitors. Following SANRA guidelines, we searched PubMed (2010-September 2025) for clinical trials and key preclinical studies, with particular attention to the molecular mechanism of differentiation induction, clinical efficacy, and the management of differentiation syndrome (DS). IDH1/2 inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib, olutasidenib) yield overall response rates (ORRs) of 30-94% in AML with DS in 10-19%. Menin inhibitors (revumenib, ziftomenib, enzomenib, bleximenib) achieve ORRs of 33-88% in KMT2A-rearranged or
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.