Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Development of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Chromosome Interpretation System for Amniotic Fluid Karyotyping.

Kuan-Han Wu, Hsuan-Wei Huang, Chia Yun Lin, Hsu-Tung Huang, Tzuo-Yau Fan, Yueh-Peng Chen, Yung-Chiao Chang, Te-Yao Hsu, Kuo-Chung Lan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kuan-Han WuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7872-3485
Hsuan-Wei HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jen-Ai Hospital, Taichung 483, Taiwan.
Chia Yun LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jen-Ai Hospital, Taichung 483, Taiwan.
Hsu-Tung HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Tzuo-Yau FanCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Master of Science Degree Program in Innovation for Smart Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Yueh-Peng ChenCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Master of Science Degree Program in Innovation for Smart Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Yung-Chiao ChangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Te-Yao HsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chung LanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jen-Ai Hospital, Taichung 483, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3702-0091

Funding

Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CORPG8J0061Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CORPG8K0181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional G-banded karyotyping remains indispensable in prenatal diagnosis but continues to rely on labor-intensive, expertise-dependent visual examination. To address these challenges, we developed a modular artificial intelligence (AI) workflow that automates chromosome interpretation from amniotic fluid metaphase images. The system integrates image denoising, chromosome segmentation, overlap screening, and morphology-based classification, and was trained using 13,223 clinical cases comprising more than 50,000 manually annotated chromosomes. Across training, temporal validation, and independent testing cohorts, classification accuracy remained consistently high (97.45%, 96.95%, and 95.72%, respectively). The overlap-recognition module further reduced downstream errors by reliably identifying composite chromosome regions. When applied to unsorted metaphase images from a later clinical cohort, the workflow successfully generated draft karyotypes without manual sorting and maintained close concordance with expert review. These findings demonstrate that an AI-assisted pipeline can support cytogenetic laboratories by streamlining the most labor-intensive steps of karyotyping, potentially enhancing diagnostic efficiency while preserving interpretive reliability.

Indexed as

Amniotic FluidArtificial IntelligenceKaryotypingPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleHumansIntelligent SystemsPregnancyReproducibility of Resultsamniotic fluidartificial intelligencechromosome segmentationcytogeneticsdeep learningkaryotypesegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41751883
PMCPMC12940807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.