ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Heavy Metal Ion Removal: A Global Review of Wastewater Treatment Technologies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel cobalt-based MOF for simultaneous removal of Pb(ii) and Congo red from real textile wastewater: synergistic adsorption behavior and mechanistic insights.RSC advances · 2026Article
- A framework for microalgal biosorption of heavy metals: mechanisms, modeling, and critical insights.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Polymer-Based Nanomaterials for Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Environmental Applications-New Trends, Benefits and Future Opportunities.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Valorization of Keratin Waste as a Functional Precursor for PLA/SBS Composite Adsorbent Films.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review addresses the escalating global water crisis driven by water pollution, especially by heavy metal ions, a consequence of rapid industrialization and population growth. Due to their high toxicity, solubility, and persistence, heavy metals pose a severe threat to human health and ecosystems through bioaccumulation. The analysis highlights a strategic shift in wastewater management from simple elimination of the toxics metal ions to the recovery of metal ions with economic value. Given the increasing complexity of industrial effluents, the scientific community is intensifying its focus on evaluating the technical and financial feasibility of various treatment technologies. Significant research is being conducted to address these environmental issues, and innovative technologies are being developed to enhance the quality of water contaminated by metal ions. On the other hand, to prevent pollution, plans containing several barriers must be established, including management, economic, and technical ones. Ultimately, the reuse of treated wastewater is the only viable long-term solution for securing global drinking water supplies. A new analysis focused on the transition from traditional, inefficient, and costly wastewater treatment to advanced, resource recovery-oriented systems is essential. The current perspective shows a clear need to advance beyond synthetic laboratory studies to real-world applications while addressing operational barriers to support a circular economy based on simple disposal of the toxic metal ions to the recovery of metals with economic value (e.g., copper, gold, silver, rare metals). Also, although the field has been explored, a new review is imperative because current technologies that show high efficiency (up to 99%) in the removal of toxic metal ions (adsorption, membrane filtration, electrochemical processes) face major challenges, such as the formation of large volumes of toxic sludge, membrane fouling, and high operating costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.