ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Application of Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing for Congenital Heart Anomalies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly worldwide and poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its structural complexity and frequent association with extracardiac anomalies and genetic abnormalities. While conventional tests such as karyotyping, quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) are standard first-tier investigations, many cases remain genetically unexplained. Prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) has emerged as a valuable tool to detect pathogenic single gene variants underlying CHD. This narrative review synthesizes findings from 28 studies involving over 2000 WES-tested fetuses and more than 10,000 CHD cases. The additional diagnostic yield of WES over CMA ranged from 8.0% to 66.7%, with higher yields in syndromic or non-isolated CHD (10-50%) compared to isolated cases (7.1-27.8%). Trio-based WES outperformed proband-only sequencing by improving accuracy, reducing turnaround time, and lowering the rate of variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Prenatal WES not only clarifies genetic etiology but also reveals syndromic diagnoses, allowing CHD to be interpreted within broader multisystem contexts. Integration of phenotypic and genomic data enhances prenatal counseling, prognostication, delivery planning, and postnatal care-advancing precision medicine in fetal cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.