ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods and Prediction Models for Flowering Time Prediction in Maize.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flowering time is a fundamental trait that determines crop adaptation and yield stability. To accurately predict flowering time and identify key regulatory factors, it is necessary to extract biologically meaningful signals from high-dimensional and multi-omics datasets. Although machine learning has been increasingly applied in plant genomics, there is still limited research on how feature selection (FS) methods and genomic prediction (GP) models affect the prediction of flowering time and gene discovery, particularly regarding the combination of different FS and GP approaches and the interpretability of prediction models. To address this gap, we conducted a large-scale benchmarking study that jointly evaluated seven feature selection methods and six prediction models, resulting in 42 FS-GP combinations. By integrating SNP and transcriptomic data, we assessed predictive performance and further interpreted model outputs using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) within a random forest (RF) framework to quantify feature contributions. This strategy successfully identified known flowering time regulators in maize, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.