Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751775›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods and Prediction Models for Flowering Time Prediction in Maize.

Yan Du, Nianhua Jia, Yueli Wang, Ronglan Li, Ying Lu, Tobias Würschum, Xintian Zhu, Wenxin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yan DuState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1788-1719
Nianhua JiaState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yueli WangState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Ronglan LiState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Ying LuState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Tobias WürschumInstitute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7397-7731
Xintian ZhuInstitute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8597-2762
Wenxin LiuState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-1244

Funding

the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)-328017493/GRK 2366 (Sino-German International Research Training Group AMAIZE-P) 328017493/GRK 2366the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1200802the Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Major Project (2022ZD04020) 2022ZD04020the Science and Technology Innovation Team of Maize Modern Seed Industry in Hebei 21326319D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowering time is a fundamental trait that determines crop adaptation and yield stability. To accurately predict flowering time and identify key regulatory factors, it is necessary to extract biologically meaningful signals from high-dimensional and multi-omics datasets. Although machine learning has been increasingly applied in plant genomics, there is still limited research on how feature selection (FS) methods and genomic prediction (GP) models affect the prediction of flowering time and gene discovery, particularly regarding the combination of different FS and GP approaches and the interpretability of prediction models. To address this gap, we conducted a large-scale benchmarking study that jointly evaluated seven feature selection methods and six prediction models, resulting in 42 FS-GP combinations. By integrating SNP and transcriptomic data, we assessed predictive performance and further interpreted model outputs using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) within a random forest (RF) framework to quantify feature contributions. This strategy successfully identified known flowering time regulators in maize, including

Indexed as

FlowersZea maysBenchmarkingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenomicsMachine LearningPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forestfeature selectionflowering timegenomic predictionmachine learningSHAP

Identifiers

PMID41751775
PMCPMC12941171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.