Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751734›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Multiple-Well Framework for Human Perceptual Decision-Making.

Joseph Fluegemann, Jiaqi Huang, Morgan Lena Rosendahl, Jerome Busemeyer, Jonathan D Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph FluegemannPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8789-3778
Jiaqi HuangDepartment of Cognitive Science, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Morgan Lena RosendahlPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Jerome BusemeyerDepartment of Cognitive Science, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7594-1871
Jonathan D CohenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a quantum cognitive model that integrates the influence of cognitive control into human perceptual decision-making. The model employs a multiple-square-well potential, where each well corresponds to a distinct decision outcome. In this framework, well depth encodes signal strength, while well width represents the domain generality of the outcome. The probability of particle localization within each well determines the subjective probability, which subsequently drives a standard Markovian evidence accumulation process to predict empirical choice and response times. We validate the model using the classic dot motion two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task. The model successfully replicates key empirical findings of the task, such as the correlation between motion coherence and drift rates. Furthermore, we apply the model to the Yerkes-Dodson law, capturing the approximate inverted U-shaped relationship between task accuracy and cognitive arousal. We compare two theoretical approaches to modeling arousal (1) as eigenenergy values and (2) as kinetic energy terms, contrasting their qualitative predictions regarding the Yerkes-Dodson law. Our work provides the first quantitative model of arousal's influence on human perceptual decision-making and establishes a foundation for determining the exact functional form of the Yerkes-Dodson law.

Indexed as

arousalcognitive controldrift diffusion modelsperceptual decision makingquantum cognition

Identifiers

PMID41751734
PMCPMC12939151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.