ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mathematical and Algorithmic Advances in Machine Learning for Statistical Process Control: A Systematic Review.
Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating machine learning (ML) with Statistical Process Control (SPC) is important for Industry 4.0 environments. Contemporary manufacturing data exhibit high-dimensionality, autocorrelation, non-stationarity, and class imbalance, which challenge classical SPC assumptions. This systematic review, conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, provides a problem-driven synthesis that links these data challenges to corresponding methodological families in ML-based SPC. Specifically, we review approaches for (1) high-dimensional and redundant data (dimensionality reduction and feature selection), (2) autocorrelated and dynamic processes (time-series and state-space models), and (3) data scarcity and imbalance (cost-sensitive learning, generative modeling, and transfer learning). Nonlinearity is treated as a cross-cutting property within each category. For each, we outline the mathematical rationale of representative algorithms and illustrate their use with industrial examples. We also summarize open issues in interpretability, thresholding, and real-time deployment. This review offers structured guidance for selecting ML techniques suited to complex manufacturing data and for designing reliable online monitoring pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.