ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Restricted Network Reconstruction from Time Series via Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a fundamental mathematical model for complex systems, complex networks describe interactions among social, infrastructural, and biological systems. However, the complete connection structure is often unobservable, making topology reconstruction from limited data-such as time series of unit states-a crucial challenge. To address network reconstruction under sparse local observations, this paper proposes a novel framework that integrates epidemic dynamics with Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory. The core of our method lies in a two-level belief fusion process: (1) Intra-node fusion, which aggregates multiple independent SIR simulation results from a single seed node to generate robust local evidence represented as Basic Probability Assignments (BPAs), effectively quantifying uncertainty; (2) Inter-node fusion, which orthogonally combines BPAs from multiple seed nodes using DS theory to synthesize a globally consistent network topology. This dual-fusion design enables the framework to handle uncertainty and conflict inherent in sparse, stochastic observations. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach. It achieves stable and high reconstruction accuracy on both a synthetic 16-node benchmark network and the real-world Zachary's Karate Club network. Furthermore, the method scales successfully to four large-scale real-world networks, attaining an average accuracy of 0.85, thereby confirming its practical applicability across networks of different scales and densities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.