Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751646›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

FedHGPrompt: Privacy-Preserving Federated Prompt Learning for Few-Shot Heterogeneous Graph Learning.

Xijun Wu, Jianjun Shi, Xinming Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xijun WuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China.
Jianjun ShiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China.
Xinming ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8136-6834

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2020YFB2103803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning from heterogeneous graphs under the constraints of both data scarcity and data privacy presents a significant challenge. While graph prompt learning offers a pathway for efficient few-shot adaptation, and federated learning provides a paradigm for decentralized training, their direct integration for heterogeneous graphs is non-trivial due to structural complexity and the need for rigorous privacy guarantees. This paper proposes FedHGPrompt, a novel federated framework that bridges this gap through a cohesive architectural design. Our approach introduces a three-layer model: a unification layer employing dual templates to standardize heterogeneous graphs and tasks, an adaptation layer utilizing trainable dual prompts to steer a frozen pre-trained model for few-shot learning, and a privacy layer integrating a cryptographic secure aggregation protocol. This design ensures that the central server only accesses aggregated updates, thereby cryptographically safeguarding individual client data. Extensive evaluations on three real-world heterogeneous graph datasets (ACM, DBLP, and Freebase) demonstrate that FedHGPrompt achieves superior few-shot learning performance compared to existing federated graph learning baselines (including FedGCN, FedGAT, FedHAN, and FedGPL) while maintaining strong privacy assurances and practical communication efficiency. The framework establishes an effective approach for collaborative learning on distributed, heterogeneous graph data where privacy is paramount.

Indexed as

federated learningfew-shot learningheterogeneous graphsprivacy preservationprompt learningsecure aggregation

Identifiers

PMID41751646
PMCPMC12939359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.