ReviewGenes2026
The Mystery of the Hidden Trace: Emerging Genetic Approaches to Improve Body Fluid Identification.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body fluid identification at crime scenes is the first step in the forensic biology workflow, leading to the identification of the perpetrator and/or, in some cases, the victim. Current methods that are regularly used in forensic criminal evidence analysis utilize well-studied properties of each fluid as the foundation of the protocol. Among these approaches, alternative light sources, chemical reactions, lateral flow immunochromatographic tests, and microscopic detection stand out to identify the main body fluids encountered at crime scenes: blood, semen, and saliva. However, these often come with limits for specificity and sensitivity. There is also difficulty with fluid mixtures, environmental degradation, and destruction of the sample by the method used. Other fluids, like vaginal fluid and fecal matter, lack standardized protocols and require innovative ideas for accurate analysis without compromising the sample. Emerging technologies based on molecular methods have been the focus of body fluid research, with emphasis on topics such as mRNA, microRNA, epigenetics, and microbial analysis. Additional information alongside the determination of fluid origin could be an advantage from new molecular techniques, such as the identification of donors from SNP analysis, if regular STR analysis is not possible. Validation studies and the integration of such research have the potential to expand and enhance the laboratory practices of forensic science. This article will provide an overview of the current methods applied in the crime lab for body fluid identification before exploring active research in this field, pointing out the potential of these techniques for application in forensic cases to overcome present issues and expand the variety of body fluids identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.